[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190129142220.3f08a1e9.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:22:20 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>,
KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/13] KVM: s390: introduce struct
kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:50:54 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:33 +0100
> Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Use this struct analog to the kvm interruption structs
> > for kvm emulated floating and local interruptions.
> > Further fields will be added with this series as
> > required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> While looking at this I was asking myself what guards against invalid
> gisa pointer dereference e.g. when pending_irqs() is called (see below).
>
> AFAIU we set up gisa_int.origin only if we have
> css_general_characteristics.aiv. Opinions?
I think you're right that this is a (pre-existing) problem.
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> > index 942cc7d33766..ee91d1de0036 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> > @@ -246,7 +246,8 @@ static inline unsigned long pending_irqs_no_gisa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > return pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) |
> > - gisa_get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa) << IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7;
> > + gisa_get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa_int.origin) <<
>
> Unconditional call to gisa_get_ipm(), and get ipm just accesses ->ipm.
All other callers of this function check for gisa != NULL first, so
either we should check here as well or move the check into the
gisa_get_ipm() function.
>
> > + IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7;
> > }
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists