[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190129132303.GE26906@osiris>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:23:03 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Liebler <stli@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_owner) within wake_futex_pi() triggered
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:24:09AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, sure. However ;) I reproduced the above with v5.0-rc4 + your
> > > patch. And now I am trying to reproduce with linux-next 20190129 +
> > > your patch and it doesn't trigger. Did I miss a patch which is only in
> > > linux-next which could fix this?
> > >
> >
> > I'm forever confused on what patch is where; but -ESRCH makes me thing
> > maybe you lost this one:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > commit da791a667536bf8322042e38ca85d55a78d3c273
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Date: Mon Dec 10 14:35:14 2018 +0100
>
> That's in Linus tree already ...
Yes, for some reason it's hardly reproducible now. It did hit once
after an hour, but (of course) without tracing enabled... still
trying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists