[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190130203525.GA23614@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:35:25 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add tachometer interrupt to
pwm-fan
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:23:31PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> > Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> hat am 30. Januar 2019 um 18:28 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:07:05PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > This adds the tachometer interrupt to the pwm-fan binding, which is
> > > necessary for RPM support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt
> > > index 49ca5d8..7f69b0b 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ Required properties:
> > >
> > > Optional properties:
> > > - fan-supply : phandle to the regulator that provides power to the fan
> > > +- interrupts : contains a single interrupt specifier which describes the
> > > + tachometer pin output of a 2 pulse-per-revolution fan.
> > > + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt for the format.
> >
> > So a hypothetical {1,4} pulse-per-revolution fan would explicitly not be
> > supported ? Why ?
>
> i could add an additional property to specify the pulse per revolution and use the 2 as default (according to the Intel spec for 4 pin pwm fan) which should fit in most cases.
>
That would be a possibility and make sense, but that is not
the point here. The "interrupts" property does not and should
not care how many pulses per revolution the fan provides.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists