linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM:VMX: Define CET VMCS fields and bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:32:59 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Cc:     rkrcmar@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com,
        yi.z.zhang@...el.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
        Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM:VMX: Define CET VMCS fields and bits

On 29/01/19 09:29, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:19:34PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 28/01/19 11:33, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>>>> There is no code in this series to pass these fields to and from
>>>> userspace, and also to save/restore U_CET, INT_SSP_TAB, PL0_SSP and
>>>> PL3_SSP across context switches.
>>>>
>>> The kernel consumes these MSRs, please see kernel CET patch:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/fancy/2018/11/20/225
>>
>> Still, even if the kernel saves these fields across context switch in
>> XSAVE areas, KVM must support accesses to the MSRs from userspace, for
>> example in order to perform live migration.
>>
>> For example, when reading/writing these in kvm_set_msr or
>> kvm_get_msr_common, you would have to do a read/write from the host
>> MSRs.  You also have to put kvm_load_guest_fpu/kvm_put_guest_fpu calls
>> in __msr_io.
> Thanks, you're right, if we want to support live migration we need do that.
> However, this feature relies on quite a few external
> dependencies, e.g., cpu capabilities, kernel version and configuration, we
> don't support live migration right now. what's your opinion?

Live migration is generally a requirement for a feature to be accepted
in KVM.

Paolo

>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>>>> In addition, PL1_SSP and PL2_SSP should be supported even if the guest
>>>> doesn't use them.  It makes sense to avoid intercepting them, but they
>>>> should still be supported and switched (possibly only if nonzero).
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something, for example a dependency on host CET support?
>>>> If not, how was this series tested?
>>>>
>>> The guest CET feature is tested with kernel CET patches on internal
>>> virtual platform.
>>>