linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190130101715.nz2bpqnust7gv4at@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:47:15 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        sudeep.holla@....com, liviu.dudau@....com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model

On 30-01-19, 09:12, Quentin Perret wrote:
> What I had in mind is something as simple as:
> 
> 	void of_dev_pm_opp_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus)
> 	{
> 		/* Bail out if an EM is there */
> 		if (em_cpu_get(cpumask_first(cpus)))
> 			return;
> 
> 		/* Check prerequisites: dpc coeff in DT, ... */
> 		...
> 
> 		em_register_perf_domain(...);
> 	}
> 
> IIUC, Matthias' point was that if the EM is already registered, there is
> no good reason to call em_register_perf_domain() again. Now, that should
> in fact be harmless because em_register_perf_domain() already does that
> check. It's just cleaner and easier to understand from a conceptual
> standpoint to not call that function several times for no reason I
> assume.

If there is no good reason to call em_register_perf_domain() several
times, then the same applies to of_dev_pm_opp_register_em() as well,
isn't it ?

This is init code anyway isn't going to run a lot, so I wouldn't
suggest adding any such (duplicate) checks in
of_dev_pm_opp_register_em().

-- 
viresh