[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190130111846.0a6b8e2c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:18:46 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/process: hardcoded core.abbrev considered
harmful!
Hi all,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 01:01:12 +0100 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Stop recommending that core.abbrev=12 be hardcoded when referring to
> kernel commits, and instead rely on the git's default abbreviation.
>
> Hardcoding this at "12" was done in
> 8401aa1f5997 ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: describe the Fixes:
> tag", 2014-06-06), back then Linus's git/git@...587c733 ("abbrev: auto
> size the default abbreviation", 2016-09-30) had not yet landed, and
> the default abbreviation was "7".
>
> At the time linux.git had around 3.5 million objects, so if the auto
> sizing had been in effect "11" would have been picked. Now "12" is
> what we pick by default anyway.
>
> More importantly, we'll roll over to "13" at around 16 million
> objects, which given the growth rate isn't that far off. At that point
> this documentation will be worse than the default.
>
> Let's just stop doing this. Git versions as of 2.11 released over 2
> years ago use the auto-sizing, and it seems like a fair assumption
> that kernel developers use a fairly recent git version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@...il.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Since I have been checking Fixes: tags, it has become obvious that some
kernel developers have core.abbrev set to 7, 9 or 10 (or maybe they are
running very old versions of git). Hopefully this will encourage them
to remove that setting (and upgrade).
Can someone (Jon?) please apply this patch?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists