linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] slub: Do trivial comments fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01ec2c57-4ece-5ee1-4d0d-d2f24695f482@iki.fi>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:06:31 +0200
From:   Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
        Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] slub: Do trivial comments fixes

On 31/01/2019 6.10, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> From: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
> 
> Hi Christopher,
> 
> Here is a trivial patchset to wet my toes. This is my first patchset to
> mm, if there are some mm specific nuances in relation to when in the dev
> cycle (if ever) that minor (*cough* trivial) pathsets are acceptable
> please say so
> 
> This patchset fixes comments strings in the SLUB subsystem.
> 
> As per discussion at LCA I am working on getting my head around the SLUB
> allocator.  If you specifically do *not* want me to do minor clean up
> while I'm reading please say so, I will not be offended.

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>