linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: fix naming scheme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:43:21 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
CC:     <broonie@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: fix naming scheme



On 01/30/2019 07:19 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:08:33 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Let general names to core drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> index 64475ad16c83..e156c345705b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> @@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ struct atmel_qspi {
>>  	struct completion	cmd_completion;
>>  };
>>  
>> -struct qspi_mode {
>> +struct atmel_qspi_mode {
>>  	u8 cmd_buswidth;
>>  	u8 addr_buswidth;
>>  	u8 data_buswidth;
>>  	u32 config;
>>  };
>>  
>> -static const struct qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>> +static const struct atmel_qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>>  	{ 1, 1, 1, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_SINGLE_BIT_SPI },
>>  	{ 1, 1, 2, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_DUAL_OUTPUT },
>>  	{ 1, 1, 4, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_QUAD_OUTPUT },
>> @@ -175,18 +175,18 @@ static const struct qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* Register access functions */
>> -static inline u32 qspi_readl(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg)
>> +static inline u32 atmel_qspi_readl(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg)
>>  {
>>  	return readl_relaxed(aq->regs + reg);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline void qspi_writel(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg, u32 value)
>> +static inline void atmel_qspi_writel(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg, u32 value)
>>  {
>>  	writel_relaxed(value, aq->regs + reg);
>>  }
> Can we get rid of these wrappers? I'm not a big fan of wrappers that
> hide the fact that accesses are relaxed.
> 

Will do, thanks!

ta