[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1ikylcn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:04:24 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: lantianyu1986@...il.com
Cc: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>, joro@...tes.org,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver
lantianyu1986@...il.com writes:
> From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>
> On the bare metal, enabling X2APIC mode requires interrupt remapping
> function which helps to deliver irq to cpu with 32-bit APIC ID.
> Hyper-V doesn't provide interrupt remapping function so far and Hyper-V
> MSI protocol already supports to deliver interrupt to the CPU whose
> virtual processor index is more than 255. IO-APIC interrupt still has
> 8-bit APIC ID limitation.
>
> This patch is to add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver in order to enable
> X2APIC mode successfully in Hyper-V Linux guest. The driver returns X2APIC
> interrupt remapping capability when X2APIC mode is available. Otherwise,
> it creates a Hyper-V irq domain to limit IO-APIC interrupts' affinity
> and make sure cpus assigned with IO-APIC interrupt have 8-bit APIC ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 7 ++
> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c | 3 +
> drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 201 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index 45d7021..5c397c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -437,4 +437,11 @@ config QCOM_IOMMU
> help
> Support for IOMMU on certain Qualcomm SoCs.
>
> +config HYPERV_IOMMU
> + bool "Hyper-V stub IOMMU support"
> + depends on HYPERV
> + help
> + Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver provides capability to run
> + Linux guest with X2APIC mode enabled.
> +
> endif # IOMMU_SUPPORT
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
> index a158a68..8c71a15 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
> @@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IOMMU) += exynos-iommu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_PAMU) += fsl_pamu.o fsl_pamu_domain.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_IOMMU) += s390-iommu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IOMMU) += qcom_iommu.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HYPERV_IOMMU) += hyperv-iommu.o
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a64b747
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "HYPERV-IR: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
> +#include <asm/io_apic.h>
> +#include <asm/irq_remapping.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +
> +#include "irq_remapping.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * According IO-APIC spec, IO APIC has a 24-entry Interrupt
> + * Redirection Table.
> + */
> +#define IOAPIC_REMAPPING_ENTRY 24
KVM already defines KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS - is this the same thing?
> +
> +static cpumask_t ioapic_max_cpumask = { CPU_BITS_NONE };
> +struct irq_domain *ioapic_ir_domain;
> +
> +static int hyperv_ir_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> + const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *parent = data->parent_data;
> + struct irq_cfg *cfg = irqd_cfg(data);
> + struct IO_APIC_route_entry *entry;
> + cpumask_t cpumask;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cpumask_andnot(&cpumask, mask, &ioapic_max_cpumask);
> +
> + /* Return error If new irq affinity is out of ioapic_max_cpumask. */
> + if (!cpumask_empty(&cpumask))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
> + if (ret < 0 || ret == IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE)
> + return ret;
> +
> + entry = data->chip_data;
> + entry->dest = cfg->dest_apicid;
> + entry->vector = cfg->vector;
> + send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip hyperv_ir_chip = {
> + .name = "HYPERV-IR",
> + .irq_ack = apic_ack_irq,
> + .irq_set_affinity = hyperv_ir_set_affinity,
> +};
> +
> +static int hyperv_irq_remapping_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs,
> + void *arg)
> +{
> + struct irq_alloc_info *info = arg;
> + struct IO_APIC_route_entry *entry;
> + struct irq_data *irq_data;
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!info || info->type != X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_IOAPIC || nr_irqs > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, arg);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> + cfg = irqd_cfg(irq_data);
> + if (!irq_data || !cfg) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail;
> + }
fail: label doesn't do anything, you can just return (and you actually
do on the first failure path).
> +
> + irq_data->chip = &hyperv_ir_chip;
> +
> + /*
> + * Save IOAPIC entry pointer here in order to set vector and
> + * and dest_apicid in the hyperv_irq_remappng_activate()
and and
> + * and hyperv_ir_set_affinity(). IOAPIC driver ignores
> + * cfg->dest_apicid and cfg->vector when irq remapping
> + * mode is enabled. Detail see ioapic_configure_entry().
I would re-phrase this a bit:
/*
* IOAPIC entry pointer is saved in chip_data to allow
* hyperv_irq_remappng_activate()/hyperv_ir_set_affinity() to set
* vector and dest_apicid. cfg->vector and cfg->dest_apicid are
* ignorred when IRQ remapping is enabled. See ioapic_configure_entry().
*/
But I'm still a bit confused. Hope others are not.
> + */
> + irq_data->chip_data = entry = info->ioapic_entry;
> +
I personally dislike double assignments, hard to remember which one
happens first :-)
> + /*
> + * Hypver-V IO APIC irq affinity should be in the scope of
> + * ioapic_max_cpumask because no irq remapping support.
> + */
> + desc = irq_data_to_desc(irq_data);
> + cpumask_and(desc->irq_common_data.affinity,
> + desc->irq_common_data.affinity,
> + &ioapic_max_cpumask);
> +
> + fail:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void hyperv_irq_remapping_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> + irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
> +static int hyperv_irq_remappng_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + struct irq_data *irq_data, bool reserve)
> +{
> + struct irq_cfg *cfg = irqd_cfg(irq_data);
> + struct IO_APIC_route_entry *entry = irq_data->chip_data;
> +
> + entry->dest = cfg->dest_apicid;
> + entry->vector = cfg->vector;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_domain_ops hyperv_ir_domain_ops = {
> + .alloc = hyperv_irq_remapping_alloc,
> + .free = hyperv_irq_remapping_free,
> + .activate = hyperv_irq_remappng_activate,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init hyperv_prepare_irq_remapping(void)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *fn;
> + u32 apic_id;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (x86_hyper_type != X86_HYPER_MS_HYPERV ||
> + !x2apic_supported())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + fn = irq_domain_alloc_named_id_fwnode("HYPERV-IR", 0);
> + if (!fn)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + ioapic_ir_domain =
> + irq_domain_create_hierarchy(arch_get_ir_parent_domain(),
> + 0, IOAPIC_REMAPPING_ENTRY, fn,
> + &hyperv_ir_domain_ops, NULL);
> +
> + irq_domain_free_fwnode(fn);
> +
> + /*
> + * Hyper-V doesn't provide irq remapping function for
> + * IO-APIC and so IO-APIC only accepts 8-bit APIC ID.
> + * Prepare max cpu affinity for IOAPIC irqs. Scan cpu 0-255
> + * and set cpu into ioapic_max_cpumask if its APIC ID is less
> + * than 255.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> + apic_id = cpu_physical_id(i);
> + if (apic_id > 255)
> + continue;
> +
> + cpumask_set_cpu(i, &ioapic_max_cpumask);
> + }
This is probably not an issue right now, but what if we have > 256 CPUs?
Assuming there are no CPUs with the same APIC is, would it be better to
go through all of them seeting bits in ioapic_max_cpumask accordingly?
(Imagine a situation when CPU257 has APIC id = 1).
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init hyperv_enable_irq_remapping(void)
> +{
> + return IRQ_REMAP_X2APIC_MODE;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_domain *hyperv_get_ir_irq_domain(struct irq_alloc_info *info)
> +{
> + if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_IOAPIC)
> + return ioapic_ir_domain;
> + else
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_remap_ops hyperv_irq_remap_ops = {
> + .prepare = hyperv_prepare_irq_remapping,
> + .enable = hyperv_enable_irq_remapping,
> + .get_ir_irq_domain = hyperv_get_ir_irq_domain,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
> index b94ebd4..81cf290 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ int __init irq_remapping_prepare(void)
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU) &&
> amd_iommu_irq_ops.prepare() == 0)
> remap_ops = &amd_iommu_irq_ops;
> + else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV_IOMMU) &&
> + hyperv_irq_remap_ops.prepare() == 0)
> + remap_ops = &hyperv_irq_remap_ops;
> else
> return -ENOSYS;
Here we act under assumption that Intel/AMD IOMMUs will never be exposed
under Hyper-V. It may make sense to actually reverse the order of the
check: check PV IOMMUs _before_ we actually check for hardware ones.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h
> index 0afef6e..f8609e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct irq_remap_ops {
>
> extern struct irq_remap_ops intel_irq_remap_ops;
> extern struct irq_remap_ops amd_iommu_irq_ops;
> +extern struct irq_remap_ops hyperv_irq_remap_ops;
>
> #else /* CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP */
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists