[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190131143723.GA32329@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:37:23 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jfehlig@...e.com,
jon.grimm@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Thomas.Lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast
> > path DMA mapping interfaces out of line, so this should move to
> > kernel/dma/mapping.c.
>
> Okay, attached patch does that. It applies on-top of this patch-set.
>
> Michael, feel free to either apply this on-top of the patch-set or merge
> the diff into patch 3, whatever you prefer.
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
I'd prefer it to be squashed if possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists