[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190131094319-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:43:51 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jfehlig@...e.com,
jon.grimm@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Thomas.Lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast
> > > path DMA mapping interfaces out of line, so this should move to
> > > kernel/dma/mapping.c.
> >
> > Okay, attached patch does that. It applies on-top of this patch-set.
> >
> > Michael, feel free to either apply this on-top of the patch-set or merge
> > the diff into patch 3, whatever you prefer.
>
> Looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> I'd prefer it to be squashed if possible.
OK. Joerg can you repost the series with this squashed
and all acks applied?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists