[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519ceef457d744e98659a2c7aa6fdd4d@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:56:13 +0000
From: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static
Hi Yue,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-remoteproc-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-remoteproc-
> owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of YueHaibing
> Sent: vendredi 1 février 2019 04:13
> To: ohad@...ery.com; bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org;
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static
>
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:279:5: warning:
> symbol 'rproc_check_carveout_da' was not declared. Should it be static?
Correction already sent on ML few weeks ago. See [1]
Regards,
Loic
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10755763/
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 54ec38f..5d4954d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc,
> const char *name, ...)
> *
> * Return: 0 if carveout match request else -ENOMEM
> */
> -int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry
> *mem,
> - u32 da, u32 len)
> +static int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem,
> + u32 da, u32 len)
> {
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> int delta = 0;
> --
> 2.7.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists