[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190201031317.18820-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:13:17 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <ohad@...ery.com>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:279:5: warning:
symbol 'rproc_check_carveout_da' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 54ec38f..5d4954d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...)
*
* Return: 0 if carveout match request else -ENOMEM
*/
-int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem,
- u32 da, u32 len)
+static int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_mem_entry *mem,
+ u32 da, u32 len)
{
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
int delta = 0;
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists