[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1902032005040.11598@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 20:05:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
WoodhouseDavid <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
SchauflerCasey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 045/305] x86/speculation: Apply IBPB more strictly
to avoid cross-process data leak
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.16.63-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>
> commit dbfe2953f63c640463c630746cd5d9de8b2f63ae upstream.
You really want the whole IBPB+STIBP revamp from upstream, otherwise
you're going to get noticeable performance penalties on some workloads
with some microcodes.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists