linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 045/305] x86/speculation: Apply IBPB more strictly to avoid cross-process data leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190203213706.GA31598@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Feb 2019 13:37:06 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        WoodhouseDavid <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        SchauflerCasey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 045/305] x86/speculation: Apply IBPB more strictly
 to avoid cross-process data leak

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 08:05:53PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2019, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> > 3.16.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> > 
> > commit dbfe2953f63c640463c630746cd5d9de8b2f63ae upstream.
> 
> You really want the whole IBPB+STIBP revamp from upstream, otherwise 
> you're going to get noticeable performance penalties on some workloads 
> with some microcodes.

Yes, we would need the opt-in/opt-out support too.

Please don't merge it just as is.

-Andi