linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] RDMA/hns: Make some function static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:34:20 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     oulijun@...wei.com, xavier.huwei@...wei.com, dledford@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] RDMA/hns: Make some function static

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:11:04AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:5822:5: warning:
>  symbol 'hns_roce_v2_query_srq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:158:6: warning:
>  symbol 'hns_roce_srq_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:81:5: warning:
>  symbol 'hns_roce_srq_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c   | 9 +++++----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Applied to for-next

Thanks,
Jason