[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6c5883015ae25b2e87576b6295c328f5903ce5a.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 01:13:25 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
WoodhouseDavid <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
SchauflerCasey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 045/305] x86/speculation: Apply IBPB more strictly
to avoid cross-process data leak
On Sun, 2019-02-03 at 13:37 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 08:05:53PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2019, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > 3.16.63-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > >
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> > >
> > > commit dbfe2953f63c640463c630746cd5d9de8b2f63ae upstream.
> >
> > You really want the whole IBPB+STIBP revamp from upstream, otherwise
> > you're going to get noticeable performance penalties on some workloads
> > with some microcodes.
>
> Yes, we would need the opt-in/opt-out support too.
>
> Please don't merge it just as is.
Thanks, I've now dropped this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is impossible to make anything foolproof
because fools are so ingenious.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists