[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3599eeec-eec1-6326-ba34-5e0f64c45934@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:52:17 +0100
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/15] KVM: s390: add gib_alert_irq_handler()
On 05.02.19 12:38, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 31/01/2019 09:52, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> The patch implements a handler for GIB alert interruptions
>> on the host. Its task is to alert guests that interrupts are
>> pending for them.
>>
>> A GIB alert interrupt statistic counter is added as well:
>>
>> $ cat /proc/interrupts
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> ...
>> GAL: 23 37 [I/O] GIB Alert
>> ...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> The only thing that bother me is the short timer's expiration value.
> But it is optimization and it is working for me so.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel<pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks, Pierre.
For completion I want to add that one sees roughly 1 timer
restart per vcpu that gets kicked in my test scenario with
12 AP IRQ guests. The guests have 4 x 1, 4 x 4 and 4 x 8 vcpus
backed by 8 IFLs. Furthermore the 12 guests share 4 CEX5C cards
each configured with 3 AP queues. On the guest runs a single
threaded AP driver that performs RSA decryptions with CRT private
keys with a short 512 bit length to get many ops/s. That
run has no additional cpu load.
./run_ap_load.sh 12
[1] 12:53:09 [SUCCESS] root@...4
[2] 12:53:09 [SUCCESS] root@...8
[3] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...2
[4] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...3
[5] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...1
[6] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...2
[7] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...6
[8] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...5
[9] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...7
[10] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...0
[11] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...9
[12] 12:53:10 [SUCCESS] root@...1
KVM guests: 12
ica_perf threads: 1
stress cpu threads: 0
stress io threads: 0
expected AP IRQs: 600048
observed AP IRQs: 600048
observed VAI IRQs: 1311
observed GAL IRQs: 575505
__gal_stats_ipm_dirty = 613762
__gal_stats_timer_active = 0
__gal_stats_timer_no_restart = 600048
__gal_stats_timer_not_active = 600048
__gal_stats_timer_restart = 613762
__gal_stats_vcpus_kicked = 599688
The counters are placed as follows:
@@ -2998,6 +2999,7 @@ static void __airqs_kick_single_vcpu(struct kvm
*kvm, u8 deliverable_mask)
if (test_and_set_bit(vcpu_id, gi->kicked_mask))
return;
kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(vcpu);
+ __gal_stats_inc(kvm, vcpus_kicked);
return;
}
}
@@ -3013,11 +3015,14 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart
gisa_vcpu_kicker(struct hrtimer *timer)
pending_mask = gisa_get_ipm_or_restore_iam(gi);
if (pending_mask) {
+ __gal_stats_inc(kvm, ipm_dirty);
__airqs_kick_single_vcpu(kvm, pending_mask);
hrtimer_forward_now(timer, ns_to_ktime(gi->expires));
+ __gal_stats_inc(kvm, timer_restart);
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
};
+ __gal_stats_inc(kvm, timer_no_restart);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
Cheers,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists