[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <422fd184-8766-4718-d302-db68ed7b90ec@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:10:49 -0500
From: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Justin Forbes <jforbes@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
On 01/31/2019 02:18 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Require signed kernel modules on systems with secure boot mode enabled.
>
> To coordinate between appended kernel module signatures and IMA
> signatures, only define an IMA MODULE_CHECK policy rule if
> CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is not enabled.
>
> This patch defines a function named set_module_sig_required() and renames
> is_module_sig_enforced() to is_module_sig_enforced_or_required(). The
> call to set_module_sig_required() is dependent on CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY
> being enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists