[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McRiemxKQTYJx1om21XrXcEmur1HJP=YSB5XocXRCbg2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:16:29 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/35] ARM: davinci: drop irq defines from default_priorites
wt., 5 lut 2019 o 01:20 David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On 1/31/19 7:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > In order to select SPARSE_IRQ we need to make the interrupt numbers
> > dynamic (at least at build-time for the top-level controller). The
> > interrupt numbers are used as array indexes for irq priorities.
> >
> > Drop the defines and just initialize the arrays in a linear manner.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > ---
[snip!]
> >
>
> Technically, any holes in the array that are being deleted
> here have a default priority of 15 assigned in the cp_intc
> driver instead of 7. I don't think this is a problem, but it
> might be worth mentioning in the commit message. Same goes
> for DA850.
>
Actually the defaulting is only done if no priorities have been
defined at all. I'll double check though if there are no holes here.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists