[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB4925A158FB93AC99D15ED3EBFC6F0@SN6PR04MB4925.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:57:17 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for
PHY
Hi,
> On 06/02/19 12:29 AM, Evan Green wrote:
> > Expose a reset controller that the phy will later use to control its
> > own PHY reset in the UFS controller. This will enable the combining
> > of PHY init functionality into a single function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
>
> I'd like to get ACK from scsi/ufs/ MAINTAINER Vinayak for me merge it in PHY
> tree.
Looks like this series is qcom specific, and has less impact of the ufs core driver.
> > + err = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &host->rcdev);
Just my 2 cents:
Isn't this should be done somewhere in drivers/clk/qcom,
Like its done for any other qcom board?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists