linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <154948253306.115909.17663891665120785337@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:48:53 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>
Cc:     Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for PHY

Quoting Avri Altman (2019-02-06 05:57:17)
> Hi,
> 
> > On 06/02/19 12:29 AM, Evan Green wrote:
> > > Expose a reset controller that the phy will later use to control its
> > > own PHY reset in the UFS controller. This will enable the combining
> > > of PHY init functionality into a single function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
> > 
> > I'd like to get ACK from scsi/ufs/ MAINTAINER Vinayak for me merge it in PHY
> > tree.
> Looks like this series is qcom specific, and has less impact of the ufs core driver.
> 
> > > +   err = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &host->rcdev);
> Just my 2 cents:
> Isn't this should be done somewhere in drivers/clk/qcom,
> Like its done for any other qcom board?

It's not a clk controller, so I don't see how that makes sense. There
are clk/reset controllers on qcom platforms, and so we've combined them
into the same overall driver there because those resets affect clk
operations and vice-versa. But this looks like some sort of reset in the
phy or the controller itself and isn't the "clk type" resets that we
implement in drivers/clk/qcom/