[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB33980C126166D851B91AB187C26F0@BYAPR12MB3398.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:38:55 +0000
From: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@...dia.com>,
Shardar Mohammed <smohammed@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V13 3/5] i2c: tegra: Add DMA support
> >> Looking into timestamps and transactions, DMA timeouts after start of DMA for I2C1 to touch during this transaction.
> >> While it is waiting for I2C1 DMA transfer, lots of DVC transactions
> >> happened thru DMA which are successful
> >>
> >> What is the I2C1 speed?
> >
> > 400KHz
> >
> >> Also incase if device is running slow for some reason, probably timeout was not enough as this patch series changes timeout with base 100mS + msg transfer time based on transfer size.
> >> Can you give quick try with increased timeout incase if device is running slow?
> >>
> >
> > Tried to increase the timeout to 1 second, doesn't help.
> >
> > What helped again is the I2C HW resetting after each transfer. Likely that means that HW isn't programmed correctly, please carefully check every bit.
> >
> > DMA-only + I2C HW reset: http://dpaste.com/26AQXFM.txt
>
> Seems I found what's the problem. Here is the fix, please include it to v14 if it is correct.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c index a9391c3646b6..5ad54da70304 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) static void tegra_i2c_config_fifo_trig(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
> size_t len) {
> - u32 val, reg;
> + u32 val = 0, reg;
> u8 dma_burst = 0;
> struct dma_slave_config slv_config = {0};
> struct dma_chan *chan;
> @@ -922,7 +922,6 @@ static void tegra_i2c_config_fifo_trig(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
> reg = I2C_MST_FIFO_CONTROL;
> else
> reg = I2C_FIFO_CONTROL;
> - val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, reg);
>
> if (i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer) {
> if (len & 0xF)
Thanks dmitry. Good catch. Didn't caught to my eyes. Yes FIFO_CONTROL is set based on read value without masking and oring causing back-back DMA transfers resulting in incorrect trig levels
We can directly set trig levels.
Will fix it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists