[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4bf079b-5f8b-3eca-2f2c-bf0fdd563fba@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:38:56 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <broonie@...nel.org>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <Cyrille.Pitchen@...rochip.com>,
<bugalski.piotr@...il.com>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: cache MR value to avoid a
write access
On 02/06/2019 06:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:33:06PM +0000, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Set the controller by default in Serial Memory Mode (SMM) at probe.
>> Cache Mode Register (MR) value to avoid write access when setting
>> the controller in serial memory mode at exec_op().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> v6: no change
>> v5: collect R-b
>
> You say you've collected a reviewed-by for this but there's no
> reviewed-by on the patch?
>
Not intended. 8/13 has the same problem. I guess I added the R-b tags after
formatting the patches, this may explain why they're gone now.
Boris, can you please add your R-b tag on 8/13 too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists