lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190206183101.9867-1-lyude@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed,  6 Feb 2019 13:31:01 -0500
From:   Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Remove rebase-detritus in VCPI helper kernel-docs

Looks like when making the final revision of:

022debad063e ("drm/atomic: Add drm_atomic_state->duplicated")

I forgot to remove some of the comments that I had added to
drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() and drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
that were no longer valid due to us having removed the state->duplicated
checks from each function. This also introduced an error while building
the docs with sphinx:

./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:3100: WARNING: Inline literal
start-string without end-string.

So, fix that by just removing the kerneldoc comments.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Fixes: 022debad063e ("drm/atomic: Add drm_atomic_state->duplicated")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 5a99135d39cd..dc7ac0c60547 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3097,10 +3097,6 @@ static int drm_dp_init_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
  * @port as needed. It is not OK however, to call this function and
  * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() in the same atomic check phase.
  *
- * When &drm_atomic_state.duplicated is set to %true%, this function will not
- * perform any error checking and will instead simply return the previously
- * recorded VCPI allocations.
- *
  * See also:
  * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
  * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
@@ -3185,11 +3181,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots);
  * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() on the same @port in a single atomic check
  * phase.
  *
- * When &drm_atomic_state.duplicated is set, this function will not
- * modify the VCPI allocations in &drm_dp_mst_topology_state.vcpis, so that
- * those VCPI allocations may be restored as-is from the duplicated state. In
- * this scenario, this function will always return 0.
- *
  * See also:
  * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
  * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ