[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o97ovke3.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:31:32 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com, mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
sre@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] support ROHM BD70528 PMIC
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> writes:
> Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD70528 PMIC
>
> Please note that patch 1 breaks compilation without patches 2 and 3
> Knowing the bd718x7 driver is already in upstream, it might be good
> if this change went through single tree, right?
That would break bisect, please avoid that. So after applying patches
from a patchset one by one the compilation should always succeed.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists