linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiZ3t_YbtRz1tLTEvF0JS1DH07DdDR3FP-FHcZW8wfSAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:53:01 +0000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.21

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 1:24 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> How bad would it be to set CR0.CD while fiddling with the page tables rather than masking the address?

I would suggest against it. When you disable caching, things don't
just go "slightly slower". Everything comes to a screeching halt, with
instruction fetch etc becoming a serious problem.

So disabling caching for a few instructions in a very simple asm
snippet might be reasonable (particularly since you could pre-fetch
the cache and just rely on CR0.CD not fetching *new* lines). But doing
it in C code that might have things like tracing enabled etc? I'd be
very very leery.

                 Linus