lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190207154446.3f48c496@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:44:46 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
        James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c

between commit:

  7961cba6f7d8 ("scsi: lpfc: nvme: avoid hang / use-after-free when destroying localport")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  4c47efc140fa ("scsi: lpfc: Move SCSI and NVME Stats to hardware queue structures")

from the scsi-mkp tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
index c84621a80ee5,e73895674f39..000000000000
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
@@@ -2592,16 -2178,14 +2180,14 @@@ lpfc_nvme_destroy_localport(struct lpfc
  #if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVME_FC))
  	struct nvme_fc_local_port *localport;
  	struct lpfc_nvme_lport *lport;
- 	struct lpfc_nvme_ctrl_stat *cstat;
  	int ret;
 +	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(lport_unreg_cmp);
  
  	if (vport->nvmei_support == 0)
  		return;
  
  	localport = vport->localport;
 -	vport->localport = NULL;
  	lport = (struct lpfc_nvme_lport *)localport->private;
- 	cstat = lport->cstat;
  
  	lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_NVME,
  			 "6011 Destroying NVME localport %p\n",
@@@ -2616,9 -2200,7 +2202,8 @@@
  	/* Wait for completion.  This either blocks
  	 * indefinitely or succeeds
  	 */
 -	lpfc_nvme_lport_unreg_wait(vport, lport);
 +	lpfc_nvme_lport_unreg_wait(vport, lport, &lport_unreg_cmp);
 +	vport->localport = NULL;
- 	kfree(cstat);
  
  	/* Regardless of the unregister upcall response, clear
  	 * nvmei_support.  All rports are unregistered and the

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ