[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eea2211e-6342-1949-5a3e-2c08b87db0d9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:30:02 -0800
From: James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree
On 2/6/2019 8:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 7961cba6f7d8 ("scsi: lpfc: nvme: avoid hang / use-after-free when destroying localport")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 4c47efc140fa ("scsi: lpfc: Move SCSI and NVME Stats to hardware queue structures")
>
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thank You. The fixup patch looks correct.
Martin, let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to do.
-- james
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists