linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 19:36:20 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guy Shattah <sguy@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:54:24AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   1651925d403e ("net/mlx5e: Use the inner headers to determine tc/pedit offload limitation on decap flows")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   738678817573 ("drivers: net: use flow action infrastructure")
> 
> from the net-next tree.

This conflict resolution when merging net into net-next looks good to me.

Thanks.