| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190207193006.u2k33gmrsmz35gvd@linux-r8p5>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:30:06 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dbueso@...e.de, longman@...hat.com,
will.deacon@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
xieyongji@...du.com, mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, elohimes@...il.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] sched/wake_q: Reduce reference counting for
special users
Could this change be pushed to v5.0 (tip/urgent) just like the wake_q fixes
that are already in Linus' tree? This will help backporting efforts as
most distros will want to avoid the performance hit and include this
patch.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019, tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>Commit-ID: 07879c6a3740fbbf3c8891a0ab484c20a12794d8
>Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/07879c6a3740fbbf3c8891a0ab484c20a12794d8
>Author: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
>AuthorDate: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:53:52 -0800
>Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>CommitDate: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:03:28 +0100
>
>sched/wake_q: Reduce reference counting for special users
>
>Some users, specifically futexes and rwsems, required fixes
>that allowed the callers to be safe when wakeups occur before
>they are expected by wake_up_q(). Such scenarios also play
>games and rely on reference counting, and until now were
>pivoting on wake_q doing it. With the wake_q_add() call being
>moved down, this can no longer be the case. As such we end up
>with a a double task refcounting overhead; and these callers
>care enough about this (being rather core-ish).
>
>This patch introduces a wake_q_add_safe() call that serves
>for callers that have already done refcounting and therefore the
>task is 'safe' from wake_q point of view (int that it requires
>reference throughout the entire queue/>wakeup cycle). In the one
>case it has internal reference counting, in the other case it
>consumes the reference counting.
>
>Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
>Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...du.com>
>Cc: Yongji Xie <elohimes@...il.com>
>Cc: andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com
>Cc: lilin24@...du.com
>Cc: liuqi16@...du.com
>Cc: nixun@...du.com
>Cc: yuanlinsi01@...du.com
>Cc: zhangyu31@...du.com
>Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218195352.7orq3upiwfdbrdne@linux-r8p5
>Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>---
> include/linux/sched/wake_q.h | 4 +--
> kernel/futex.c | 3 +--
> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 4 +--
> kernel/sched/core.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h b/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h
>index 545f37138057..ad826d2a4557 100644
>--- a/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h
>+++ b/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h
>@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static inline void wake_q_init(struct wake_q_head *head)
> head->lastp = &head->first;
> }
>
>-extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head,
>- struct task_struct *task);
>+extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
>+extern void wake_q_add_safe(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
> extern void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head);
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_WAKE_Q_H */
>diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
>index 69e619baf709..2abe1a0b3062 100644
>--- a/kernel/futex.c
>+++ b/kernel/futex.c
>@@ -1463,8 +1463,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
> * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released
> * the hb->lock. wake_q_add() grabs reference to p.
> */
>- wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
>- put_task_struct(p);
>+ wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, p);
> }
>
> /*
>diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
>index 50d9af615dc4..fbe96341beee 100644
>--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
>+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
>@@ -211,9 +211,7 @@ static void __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> * Ensure issuing the wakeup (either by us or someone else)
> * after setting the reader waiter to nil.
> */
>- wake_q_add(wake_q, tsk);
>- /* wake_q_add() already take the task ref */
>- put_task_struct(tsk);
>+ wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, tsk);
> }
>
> adjustment = woken * RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS - adjustment;
>diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>index 3c8b4dba3d2d..64ceaa5158c5 100644
>--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>@@ -396,19 +396,7 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> #endif
> #endif
>
>-/**
>- * wake_q_add() - queue a wakeup for 'later' waking.
>- * @head: the wake_q_head to add @task to
>- * @task: the task to queue for 'later' wakeup
>- *
>- * Queue a task for later wakeup, most likely by the wake_up_q() call in the
>- * same context, _HOWEVER_ this is not guaranteed, the wakeup can come
>- * instantly.
>- *
>- * This function must be used as-if it were wake_up_process(); IOW the task
>- * must be ready to be woken at this location.
>- */
>-void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
>+static bool __wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
> {
> struct wake_q_node *node = &task->wake_q;
>
>@@ -422,15 +410,55 @@ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
> */
> smp_mb__before_atomic();
> if (unlikely(cmpxchg_relaxed(&node->next, NULL, WAKE_Q_TAIL)))
>- return;
>-
>- get_task_struct(task);
>+ return false;
>
> /*
> * The head is context local, there can be no concurrency.
> */
> *head->lastp = node;
> head->lastp = &node->next;
>+ return true;
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * wake_q_add() - queue a wakeup for 'later' waking.
>+ * @head: the wake_q_head to add @task to
>+ * @task: the task to queue for 'later' wakeup
>+ *
>+ * Queue a task for later wakeup, most likely by the wake_up_q() call in the
>+ * same context, _HOWEVER_ this is not guaranteed, the wakeup can come
>+ * instantly.
>+ *
>+ * This function must be used as-if it were wake_up_process(); IOW the task
>+ * must be ready to be woken at this location.
>+ */
>+void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
>+{
>+ if (__wake_q_add(head, task))
>+ get_task_struct(task);
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * wake_q_add_safe() - safely queue a wakeup for 'later' waking.
>+ * @head: the wake_q_head to add @task to
>+ * @task: the task to queue for 'later' wakeup
>+ *
>+ * Queue a task for later wakeup, most likely by the wake_up_q() call in the
>+ * same context, _HOWEVER_ this is not guaranteed, the wakeup can come
>+ * instantly.
>+ *
>+ * This function must be used as-if it were wake_up_process(); IOW the task
>+ * must be ready to be woken at this location.
>+ *
>+ * This function is essentially a task-safe equivalent to wake_q_add(). Callers
>+ * that already hold reference to @task can call the 'safe' version and trust
>+ * wake_q to do the right thing depending whether or not the @task is already
>+ * queued for wakeup.
>+ */
>+void wake_q_add_safe(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
>+{
>+ if (!__wake_q_add(head, task))
>+ put_task_struct(task);
> }
>
> void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists