[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1549980892-28583-1-git-send-email-neelx@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:14:52 +0100
From: Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>
To: tipbot@...or.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave@...olabs.net, dbueso@...e.de,
elohimes@...il.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, longman@...hat.com,
mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
will.deacon@....com, xieyongji@...du.com, neelx@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] sched/wake_q: Reduce reference counting for special users
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 69e619baf709..2abe1a0b3062 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1463,8 +1463,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
> * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released
> * the hb->lock. wake_q_add() grabs reference to p.
Should this comment be fixed as well?
--nX
> */
> - wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
> - put_task_struct(p);
> + wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, p);
> }
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists