linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Habana Labs kernel driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFCwf12SPXjuDSfViSTLZexdi1YoNKqcGtb6k3H5bU6o2kzmeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 23:44:11 +0200
From:   Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, ogabbay@...ana.ai,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Habana Labs kernel driver

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:43 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 23:33 +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:52 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:32:39PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > This is v3 of the Habana Labs kernel driver patch-set. It contains minor fixes
> > > > according to reviews done on v2. In addition, it is rebased on v5.0-rc5.
> []
> > > Nit: git am is unhappy about black lines at EOF, e.g:
> > >
> > > Applying: habanalabs: add basic Goya support
> > > .git/rebase-apply/patch:29: new blank line at EOF.
> > > +
> > Yes, but on the other hand, joe perches gave me a comment about
> > missing newline at end of Makefile.
> > So either diff will complain or git am.
>
> Not really.
>
> The desired modification was the last non-blank line of
> the Makefile should have a terminating newline, not that
> there was a blank line at EOF.
>
>
ok, thanks for the clarification, I'll fix that.
Oded