[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e6afb87-73e1-9688-7602-b7579fb94590@wdc.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:56:13 -0800
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Patrick Stählin <me@...ki.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 6/8] clocksource/drivers/riscv: Add required checks
during clock source init
On 2/8/19 1:04 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:51:19PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
>> Currently, clocksource registration happens for an invalid cpu
>> for non-smp kernels. This lead to kernel panic as cpu hotplug
>> registration will fail for those cpus. Moreover,
>> riscv_hartid_to_cpuid can return errors now.
>>
>> Do not proceed if hartid or cpuid is invalid. Take this opprtunity
>> to print appropriate error strings for different failure cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> index 43189220..3c7ea75b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> @@ -95,13 +95,30 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
>> struct clocksource *cs;
>>
>> hartid = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n);
>> + if (hartid < 0) {
>> + pr_warn("Not valid hartid for node [%pOF] error = [%d]\n",
>> + n, hartid);
>> + return hartid;
>> + }
>> +
>> cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
>> + if (cpuid < 0) {
>> + pr_warn("Invalid cpuid for hartid [%d]\n", hartid);
>> + return cpuid;
>> + }
>>
>> if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
>> return 0;
>>
>> + pr_err("%s: Registering clocksource cpuid [%d] hartid [%d]\n",
>> + __func__, cpuid, hartid);
>
> This does not look like an error case to me. At best it is info,
> if not debug.
>
Thanks for catching. It was a typo. I will fix it in next version.
Regards,
Atish
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists