[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1549666675.10972.55.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:57:57 +0000
From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz" <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"sbauer@...donthack.me" <sbauer@...donthack.me>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de"
<jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] block: sed-opal: reuse response_get_token to
decrease code duplication
Looks good
Reviewed-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 21:50 +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> response_get_token had already been in place, its functionality had
> been duplicated within response_get_{u64,bytestring} with the same error
> handling. Unify the handling by reusing response_get_token within the
> other functions.
>
> Co-authored-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
> Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
> ---
> block/sed-opal.c | 46 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
> index 537cd73ea88a..1332547e5a99 100644
> --- a/block/sed-opal.c
> +++ b/block/sed-opal.c
> @@ -889,27 +889,19 @@ static size_t response_get_string(const struct parsed_resp *resp, int n,
> const char **store)
> {
> u8 skip;
> - const struct opal_resp_tok *token;
> + const struct opal_resp_tok *tok;
>
> *store = NULL;
> - if (!resp) {
> - pr_debug("Response is NULL\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (n >= resp->num) {
> - pr_debug("Response has %d tokens. Can't access %d\n",
> - resp->num, n);
> + tok = response_get_token(resp, n);
> + if (IS_ERR(tok))
> return 0;
> - }
>
> - token = &resp->toks[n];
> - if (token->type != OPAL_DTA_TOKENID_BYTESTRING) {
> + if (tok->type != OPAL_DTA_TOKENID_BYTESTRING) {
> pr_debug("Token is not a byte string!\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> - switch (token->width) {
> + switch (tok->width) {
> case OPAL_WIDTH_TINY:
> case OPAL_WIDTH_SHORT:
> skip = 1;
> @@ -925,37 +917,29 @@ static size_t response_get_string(const struct parsed_resp *resp, int n,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - *store = token->pos + skip;
> - return token->len - skip;
> + *store = tok->pos + skip;
> + return tok->len - skip;
> }
>
> static u64 response_get_u64(const struct parsed_resp *resp, int n)
> {
> - if (!resp) {
> - pr_debug("Response is NULL\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> + const struct opal_resp_tok *tok;
>
> - if (n >= resp->num) {
> - pr_debug("Response has %d tokens. Can't access %d\n",
> - resp->num, n);
> + tok = response_get_token(resp, n);
> + if (IS_ERR(tok))
> return 0;
> - }
>
> - if (resp->toks[n].type != OPAL_DTA_TOKENID_UINT) {
> - pr_debug("Token is not unsigned it: %d\n",
> - resp->toks[n].type);
> + if (tok->type != OPAL_DTA_TOKENID_UINT) {
> + pr_debug("Token is not unsigned int: %d\n", tok->type);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (!(resp->toks[n].width == OPAL_WIDTH_TINY ||
> - resp->toks[n].width == OPAL_WIDTH_SHORT)) {
> - pr_debug("Atom is not short or tiny: %d\n",
> - resp->toks[n].width);
> + if (tok->width != OPAL_WIDTH_TINY && tok->width != OPAL_WIDTH_SHORT) {
> + pr_debug("Atom is not short or tiny: %d\n", tok->width);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - return resp->toks[n].stored.u;
> + return tok->stored.u;
> }
>
> static bool response_token_matches(const struct opal_resp_tok *token, u8 match)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3278 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists