[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190208115447.ojyfhenf44kqs3w4@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:54:47 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 5.0-rc5 regression with NAT, bisected to: netfilter: nat:
remove l4proto->manip_pkt
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it> wrote:
> > L.S.,
> >
> > While trying out a 5.0-RC5 kernel I seem to have stumbled over a regression with NAT.
> > (using an nftables firewall with NAT and connection tracking).
> >
> > Unfortunately it isn't too obvious since no errors are logged, but on clients it
> > causes symptoms like firefox intermittently not being able to load pages with:
> > Network Protocol Error
> > An error occurred during a connection to www.example.com
> > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because an error in the network protocol was detected.
> > Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
> >
> > But it's only intermittently, so i can still visit some webpages with clients,
> > could be that packet size and or fragments are at play ?
> >
> > So I tried testing with git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git with
> > e8c32c32b48c2e889704d8ca0872f92eb027838e as last commit, to be sure to have the latest netdev has to offer,
> > but to no avail.
> >
> > After that I tried to git bisect and ended up with:
> >
> > faec18dbb0405c7d4dda025054511dc3a6696918 is the first bad commit
> > commit faec18dbb0405c7d4dda025054511dc3a6696918
> > Author: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> > Date: Thu Dec 13 16:01:33 2018 +0100
> >
> > netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->manip_pkt
>
> Thanks, this is immensely helpful.
>
> I think I see the bug, we can't use target->dst.protonum in
> nf_nat_l4proto_manip_pkt(), it will be TCP in case we're dealing
> with a related icmp packet.
>
> I will send a patch in a few hours when I get back.
Sander, does this patch fix things for you?
Thanks!
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Change outer to look like the reply to an incoming packet */
nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
+ target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMP;
if (!nf_nat_ipv4_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
return 0;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmpv6_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
+ target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
if (!nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists