[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c5ac167-7682-a945-d402-19f2e023fc5f@eikelenboom.it>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:34:32 +0100
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 5.0-rc5 regression with NAT, bisected to: netfilter: nat:
remove l4proto->manip_pkt
On 08/02/2019 12:54, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>> Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it> wrote:
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>> While trying out a 5.0-RC5 kernel I seem to have stumbled over a regression with NAT.
>>> (using an nftables firewall with NAT and connection tracking).
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it isn't too obvious since no errors are logged, but on clients it
>>> causes symptoms like firefox intermittently not being able to load pages with:
>>> Network Protocol Error
>>> An error occurred during a connection to www.example.com
>>> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because an error in the network protocol was detected.
>>> Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
>>>
>>> But it's only intermittently, so i can still visit some webpages with clients,
>>> could be that packet size and or fragments are at play ?
>>>
>>> So I tried testing with git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git with
>>> e8c32c32b48c2e889704d8ca0872f92eb027838e as last commit, to be sure to have the latest netdev has to offer,
>>> but to no avail.
>>>
>>> After that I tried to git bisect and ended up with:
>>>
>>> faec18dbb0405c7d4dda025054511dc3a6696918 is the first bad commit
>>> commit faec18dbb0405c7d4dda025054511dc3a6696918
>>> Author: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
>>> Date: Thu Dec 13 16:01:33 2018 +0100
>>>
>>> netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->manip_pkt
>>
>> Thanks, this is immensely helpful.
>>
>> I think I see the bug, we can't use target->dst.protonum in
>> nf_nat_l4proto_manip_pkt(), it will be TCP in case we're dealing
>> with a related icmp packet.
>>
>> I will send a patch in a few hours when I get back.
>
> Sander, does this patch fix things for you?
Hi Florian,
You may stick on a reported/tested-by if you like.
Thanks for the swift fix !
--
Sander
>
> Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> /* Change outer to look like the reply to an incoming packet */
> nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
> + target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMP;
> if (!nf_nat_ipv4_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmpv6_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
>
> nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
> + target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
> if (!nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
> return 0;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists