linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=McNvvowdQG3zNhLpAuOL-Q_U1184mTwcJWJMRxto1LYbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:27:26 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

pt., 8 lut 2019 o 12:43 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> napisał(a):
>
> On 05/02/19 9:41 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > pon., 4 lut 2019 o 22:49 David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> On 1/31/19 7:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >>>
> >>> This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up
> >>> the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This has been on my todo list for years, but I've never had enough
> >> time to figure it out. Nice to see it finally getting done!
> >>
> >> Series tested on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 (da850-like). I can now use
> >> IIO triggers without having to patch the kernel to add extra
> >> interrupts.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Wow thanks for taking the time to review it!
> >
> > I'll address certain remarks - for those unaddressed - I'll fix them in v2.
> >
> > Sekhar: are you fine with sending both the clocksource and interrupt
> > series together next time with additional patches on top making
> > davinci part of multi_v5_defconfig?
>
> I think its better to keep them separate. You can base both on latest
> mainline.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar

If you prefer I can keep them separate, although there were a couple
conflicts when I merged them in my tree, which are now resolved.

Let's maybe start with the interrupts (I'll send a v2 tonight if you
don't have any more comments), and once you have that in your tree, I
will rebase the timer code and then the multi_v5 series.

Bart