linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:59:07 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

On 08/02/19 5:57 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pt., 8 lut 2019 o 12:43 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> napisał(a):
>>
>> On 05/02/19 9:41 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> pon., 4 lut 2019 o 22:49 David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> napisał(a):
>>>>
>>>> On 1/31/19 7:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up
>>>>> the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This has been on my todo list for years, but I've never had enough
>>>> time to figure it out. Nice to see it finally getting done!
>>>>
>>>> Series tested on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 (da850-like). I can now use
>>>> IIO triggers without having to patch the kernel to add extra
>>>> interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wow thanks for taking the time to review it!
>>>
>>> I'll address certain remarks - for those unaddressed - I'll fix them in v2.
>>>
>>> Sekhar: are you fine with sending both the clocksource and interrupt
>>> series together next time with additional patches on top making
>>> davinci part of multi_v5_defconfig?
>>
>> I think its better to keep them separate. You can base both on latest
>> mainline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
> 
> If you prefer I can keep them separate, although there were a couple
> conflicts when I merged them in my tree, which are now resolved.
> 
> Let's maybe start with the interrupts (I'll send a v2 tonight if you
> don't have any more comments), and once you have that in your tree, I
> will rebase the timer code and then the multi_v5 series.

Sounds good. I have no more comments on the interrupt series. We will
need acks from irqchip maintainers before merging though.

Thanks,
Sekhar