lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:45:53 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour

On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also
>> returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier
>> that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it...
> That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e.
> callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter
> back as a return value).

Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well...

>
> /Jarkko
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists