[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <22ef544f-e841-a8ea-cec7-fb64fe368fe8@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:36:19 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour
On 2/8/19 11:30 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> static void tpm_nsc_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 60e2038652b8..1d781c19f112 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -507,7 +507,11 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> if (!priv->irq_tested)
> disable_interrupts(chip);
> priv->irq_tested = true;
> - return rc;
> +
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
That's not all... There's this above it as well with tpm_tis_send_main
returning with 'return len;'.
if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) || priv->irq_tested)
return tpm_tis_send_main(chip, buf, len);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists