[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190209162545.GA30856@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:25:45 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET
PHYs
> I'd propose that you extract generic patches being submission-ready
> and split the patch series into two. I think the following patches
> would be candidates for the first series: 2, 3, 5, 6
> (provided they have no dependency on the other patches)
> Based on that both of us can go on with our work.
>
> Andrew, what do you think?
Yes, that would help.
Heiner, can you also submit the .get_features patches soon. That is
another important piece of the puzzle for both drivers.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists