linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:28:23 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
        mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET
 PHYs

On 09.02.2019 17:25, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> I'd propose that you extract generic patches being submission-ready
>> and split the patch series into two. I think the following patches
>> would be candidates for the first series: 2, 3, 5, 6
>> (provided they have no dependency on the other patches)
>> Based on that both of us can go on with our work.
>>
>> Andrew, what do you think?
> 
> Yes, that would help.
> 
> Heiner, can you also submit the .get_features patches soon. That is
> another important piece of the puzzle for both drivers.
> 
Just submitted it few hours ago.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1039237/

> 	Thanks
> 		Andrew
> 
Heiner