[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190210213320.fs5kzezyzwd6akpx@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 22:33:20 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
vilhelm.gray@...il.com, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: counter: stm32-lptimer: Add power management
support
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:21:33PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:40:29 +0100
> Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com> wrote:
>
> > Add suspend/resume PM sleep ops. When going to low power, disable
> > active counter. Only active counter should be resumed: don't touch
> > disabled counter, as it may be used by other LPTimer MFD child driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
> I think this looks fine. I'm not totally sure if patches 3,4 are
> separable from 1,2 though so please let me know whether I should take
> these now, or let all 4 go in together via some path?
I'd say these are orthogonal, so if you are happy with patches 3 and 4
you can take them without bothering for patches 1 and 2.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists