lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:47:34 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <>
To:     Rob Herring <>,
        Frank Rowand <>,
        Mike Rapoport <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <>,
        Catalin Marinas <>,
        Prateek Patel <>,
        DT <>,
        LKML <>,
        stable <>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in
 early memory reservation

On 04/02/2019 15:37, Marc Gonzalez wrote:

> Cc: # 3.15+
> Fixes: 3f0c820664483 ("drivers: of: add initialization code for dynamic reserved memory")
> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <>
> Acked-by: Prateek Patel <>
> Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez <>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <>
> ---
> Resend with DT CCed to reach robh's patch queue
> I added CC: stable, Fixes, and Prateek's ack
> Trim recipients list to minimize inconvenience

Mike, Stephen,

I'm confused over commit 3532b3b554a216f30edb841d29eef48521bdc592 in linux-next
"memblock: drop __memblock_alloc_base()"

It's definitely going to conflict with the proposed patch
over drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c

Rob, what's the next step then?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists