lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b879fd2-5c0a-aecc-b6cb-02e5255c22f6@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:55:36 -0800
From:   Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, PeterHuewe@....de,
        jgg@...pe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: tpm2: Extend tests to cover partial reads

On 2/11/19 8:48 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> You are missing a cover letter from this patch set. Please have it in
> v2. Also use tag "selftests/tpm2" instead of having two tags in the
> short summaries. Now they look a bit weird.

Since when is the cover letter mandatory?
I understand that is helps for a complicated patch set
to explain the problem and solution in the cover letter,
but for this simple test case addition what's the point?
And there is nothing forcing a cover letter in
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.20/process/submitting-patches.html

Also double tags seams to be quite common for selftest.
See git log tools/testing/selftests/
Thanks,
-- 
Tadeusz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ