lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:24:33 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
Cc:     Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:31:19AM +0100, Federico Vaga wrote:
> If the Interrupt Flag (IF) is not set, we should not handle the IRQ:
> - the line can be shared with other devices
> - it can be a spurious interrupt
> 
> To avoid reading twice the status register, the ocores_process() function
> expects it to be read by the caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> 

Applied to for-next, thanks!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ