[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211125337.16099-3-chintan.pandya@oneplus.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:53:55 +0000
From: Chintan Pandya <chintan.pandya@...plus.com>
To: Linux Upstream <linux.upstream@...plus.com>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"mawilcox@...rosoft.com" <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Chintan Pandya <chintan.pandya@...plus.com>
Subject: [RFC 2/2] page-flags: Catch the double setter of page flags
Some of the page flags, like PG_locked is not supposed to
be set twice. Currently, there is no protection around this
and many callers directly tries to set this bit. Others
follow trylock_page() which is much safer version of the
same. But, for performance issues, we may not want to
implement wait-until-set. So, at least, find out who is
doing double setting and fix them.
Change-Id: I1295fcb8527ce4b54d5d11c11287fc7516006cf0
Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya <chintan.pandya@...plus.com>
---
include/linux/page-flags.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index a56a9bd4bc6b..e307775c2b4a 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static __always_inline int Page##uname(struct page *page) \
#define SETPAGEFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \
static __always_inline void SetPage##uname(struct page *page) \
- { set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
+ { WARN_ON(test_and_set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags)); }
#define CLEARPAGEFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \
static __always_inline void ClearPage##uname(struct page *page) \
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists