lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190212215118.9779-1-stuart.menefy@mathembedded.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:51:18 +0000
From:   Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>
To:     Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] regulator: s2mpa01: Fix step values for some LDOs

The step values for some of the LDOs appears to be incorrect, resulting
in incorrect voltages (or at least, ones which are different from the
Samsung 3.4 vendor kernel).

Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
index 095d25f3d2ea..58a1fe583a6c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
@@ -298,13 +298,13 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
 	regulator_desc_ldo(2, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(3, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(4, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(6, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(7, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(8, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(9, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(10, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_25_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(12, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(13, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(14, STEP_50_MV),
@@ -315,11 +315,11 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
 	regulator_desc_ldo(19, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(20, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(21, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_25_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_25_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(24, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(25, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(1),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(2),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(3),
-- 
2.13.6

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ