[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213171855.GD1883@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:18:55 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, dvhart@...radead.org,
andy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:43:30PM +0530, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote:
> Hi Borislav, I realize that the link i mentioned is not public. Apologies
> for creating confusion around that and for the previous top posting. I will
> drop references to the coreboot link too in the next version.
As we talked on IRC with Dave, those patches don't need to point to an
official document.
If the model number is wrong, we'll learn very soon about it. :-)
If it is a patchset enabling a feature or an erratum, then this becomes
a whole different story.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists